🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 929+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Lincoln Logs, Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(929 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln LogsUsed

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Lincoln Logs, Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs

Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs
Used

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2216

Category: Toys > Building Toys > Wooden Blocks

Original Price:$50 USD

Sale Price:$30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand merely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7469 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous find!​
For the price, it works fine which feels reasonable.
22 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really pleased
The Lincoln Logs, Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs is practical and plain.
12 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb quality
Personally, it works well enough and it meets expectations.
34 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
truly satisfied
In daily use, the Lincoln Logs, Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs works fine and it’s fine overall.
39 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply astonishing
To be fair, it feels solid enough which feels reasonable. dispatch was normal.
32 people found this helpful