๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.6/5 from 298+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

1950s vintage pitcher

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.6 out of 5(298 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$8.73​
$14.55
Sale
โœ“ at no charge delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

superb condition Vintage 1950s pitcherGreat dealno returnsEnjoy:)

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-no-cost Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

1950s vintage pitcher

outstanding condition
Vintage 1950s pitcher
superb deal
no returns
relish:)​

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 76451

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Pitchers

Original Price:$14.55 USD

Sale Price:$8.73 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ at no charge dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.6
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9862 reviews
AW
Ashley White โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb investment
After assorted use, it feels solid enough and Iโ€™m satisfied.
19 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Memphis, TN 
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Worth every penny
For the price, the 1950s vintage pitcher fits my needs and it meets expectations.
35 people found this helpful
SM​
Sarah Miller โœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago ยท Orlando, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Really superb
So far, it does the job so no complaints.
12 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Detroit, MI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Impressed!
At first, the 1950s vintage pitcher is hassle-at no charge to use which is good enough.
40 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Tampa, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
only what I wanted
So far, the 1950s vintage pitcher works as described which is good enough.
42 people found this helpful