🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 186+ reviews
Officeβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Rolodex

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5(186 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$39.97
$66.62
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage ROLODEX SW 24C Swivel File Plastic Faux Wood Large Round Rotary Office

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Rolodex

Vintage ROLODEX SW 24C Swivel File Plastic Faux Wood Large Round Rotary Office

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Office products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 294897

Category: Office > Desk Organization > Business Card Holders

Original Price:$66.62 USD

Sale Price:$39.97 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand merely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8833 reviews

DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
appreciate love love!
For the price, the Vintage Rolodex fits my needs and I don’t regret it.
9 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly pleased
So far, it works well enough which is good enough. shipment was normal.
47 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Brilliant Vintage Rolodex
The Vintage Rolodex meets basic requirements.
29 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King
4 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional purchase
For the price, the Vintage Rolodex does its job and it’s fine overall.
1 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Tucson, AZ​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Five stars!
For the price, the Vintage Rolodex feels solid and I don’t regret it.
30 people found this helpful