🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 403+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage sterling silver garnet ring.

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.6 out of 5(403 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$18.83
$31.38
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage sterling silver garnet ring.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage sterling silver garnet ring.

Vintage sterling silver garnet ring.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 688901

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price:$31.38 USD

Sale Price:$18.83 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand merely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4165 reviews
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb purchase
From my experience, the Vintage sterling silver garnet ring. works well enough so no complaints. Packaging was basic.
25 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
After assorted use, it does the job and I don’t regret it.
25 people found this helpful
AW​
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding quality
To be fair, the Vintage sterling silver garnet ring. works well enough which feels reasonable.
5 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson
10 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
So far, the Vintage sterling silver garnet ring. feels okay which feels reasonable.
19 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent quality
After a few use, the Vintage sterling silver garnet ring. is straightforward to use so I’m okay with it. Works fine so far.
1 people found this helpful