๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 326+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Cross Earrings

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.1 out of 5(326 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$26.77
$44.62
Sale
โœ“ at no charge delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

1970 s Cross earrings with 5 different colored stones,, superb condition

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-no-cost Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Cross Earrings

1970 s Cross earrings with 5 different colored stones,, outstanding condition

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 703870

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Earrings

Original Price:$44.62 USD

Sale Price:$26.77 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 1206 reviews
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
exceptional in every way​
After a few uses, the Cross Earrings seems reliable.
50 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 days ago ยท Philadelphia, PA​
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it
From my experience, the Cross Earrings is elementary to use which is good enough.
50 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Dallas, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
actually impressed
After assorted use, the Cross Earrings feels solid which is good enough.
47 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Albuquerque, NM
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb value for money
Good overall quality Cross Earrings.
8 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท latest York, NY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier
After a few days, the Cross Earrings works well enough which feels reasonable.
43 people found this helpful