🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 160+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Casio AM Card Radio

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(160 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

This incredible vintage radio works perfectly, great for collectors!#2

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt Shipping
↩️
hassle-no-cost Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Casio AM Card Radio

This wonderful vintage radio works perfectly, great for collectors!

#2​

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 751133

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Radios

Original Price:$50 USD

Sale Price:$30 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7535 reviews
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
ideal purchase
From my experience, the Casio AM Card Radio feels okay which is good enough.
4 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
exceptionally satisfied
From my experience, the Casio AM Card Radio works fine and I don’t regret it.
42 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb value for money
From my experience, the Casio AM Card Radio works fine and it works for me. Arrived on time.
17 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell
7 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
solely what I wanted
Personally, the Casio AM Card Radio does its job so I’m okay with it.
8 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
No complaints
Nice design and good usability Casio AM Card Radio.
35 people found this helpful