๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 421+ reviews
Womenโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Retro Vintage Ellipse Geometric Stainless Steel Pendants

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.1 out of 5(421 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$19.3
$32.17
Sale
โœ“ at no charge delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

None

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Retro Vintage Ellipse Geometric Stainless Steel Pendants

None

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 934598

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price:$32.17 USD

Sale Price:$19.3 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand merely-arrived

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3833 reviews

JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Detroit, MI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
finest
Honestly, the Retro Vintage Ellipse Geometric Stainless Steel Pendants is better than expected.
4 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Aurora, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
impeccable for my needs
After a few days, the Retro Vintage Ellipse Geometric Stainless Steel Pendants feels solid and it meets expectations.
35 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Honolulu, HI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fancy it!
So far, it is practical so no complaints.
19 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Columbus, OH

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
No complaints
The Retro Vintage Ellipse Geometric Stainless Steel Pendants fits well into daily use.
19 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier
Iโ€™ve had no issues with the Retro Vintage Ellipse Geometric Stainless Steel Pendants yet.
19 people found this helpful​