🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 493+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(493 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$121
$201.67
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalPattern : PrintDetails : Elasticated waistArticle number : MA321A0ST-T11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers

Rise : Normal
Pattern : Print
Details : Elasticated waist
Article number : MA321A0ST-T11

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1232658

Category: Women > Clothing > Trousers

Original Price:$201.67 USD

Sale Price:$121 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand merely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3178 reviews
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous quality
So far, the PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers performs as expected and it meets expectations.
26 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers ever
The PANTS WIDE LEG - Trousers doesn’t require special care to use.
5 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
After various use, it feels okay which is good enough.​
9 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Oakland, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional in every way
After some use, it is handy to use and I’m satisfied.
38 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
terrific find!
it feels okay which is good enough.
24 people found this helpful