๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 387+ reviews
Sportsโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Pool Candy Glitter Dragon

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.1 out of 5(387 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$19.99
$33.32
Sale
โœ“ at no charge delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Glitter Dragon large pool float.Brand fresh in box

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
express delivery
โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Pool Candy Glitter Dragon

Glitter Dragon large pool float.
Brand merely-arrived in box​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Sports products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 2378564

Category: Sports > Outdoors > Water Sports

Original Price:$33.32 USD

Sale Price:$19.99 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 2743 reviews
MW
Michelle Walker โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท St. Louis, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb find!
Honestly, the Pool Candy Glitter Dragon works as described and it meets expectations.
10 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Aurora, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
appreciate love love!
the Pool Candy Glitter Dragon fits my needs which is good enough.
10 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
genuinely impressed
After assorted use, the Pool Candy Glitter Dragon works well enough so Iโ€™m okay with it.
29 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Highly urge!
From my experience, the Pool Candy Glitter Dragon works as described so no complaints.
35 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Five stars!
At first, it feels okay which is good enough.
19 people found this helpful​